fbpx Judge dismisses lawsuit seeking $500K reward from Lady Gaga
The Votes Are In!
2023 Readers' Choice is back, bigger and better than ever!
View Winners →
Nominate your favorite business!
2024 Readers' Choice is back, bigger and better than ever!
Nominate →
Subscribeto our newsletter to stay informed
  • Enter your phone number to be notified if you win
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Home / News / The Industry / Judge dismisses lawsuit seeking $500K reward from Lady Gaga

Judge dismisses lawsuit seeking $500K reward from Lady Gaga

by City News Service
share with

A judge Monday granted Lady Gaga’s motion to dismiss a civil suit brought by a woman who maintained she was entitled to collect the $500,000 reward offer the singer issued for the safe return of two French bulldogs after they were stolen in 2021.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Holly J. Fujie issued a tentative ruling on Friday in favor of the “Born This Way” singer and against plaintiff Jennifer McBride. The judge heard arguments Monday morning and affirmed her tentative ruling by making it final.

McBride returned Lady Gaga’s dogs in February 2021. She alleged in her complaint originally filed Feb. 24, then updated July 28, that the singer defrauded her into surrendering the pets with the promise that no questions would be posed if the pets were returned.

“Plaintiff was in no way involved with the theft of Lady Gaga’s bulldogs and had no knowledge of said theft or its planning before its occurrence,” the amended complaint stated.

McBride sued for breach of contract, fraud by false promise and fraud by misrepresentation. She also sought legal fees and compensation for financial damages, pain and suffering, mental anguish and loss of enjoyment of life. McBride maintained she performed her obligation under the reward contract and that the singer never intended to pay the reward.

But in their court papers, the singer’s lawyers disputed McBride’s claims of innocence. They maintained that McBride was part of a conspiracy to steal the animals.

“Put simply, no amount of repleading, artful or otherwise, can overcome the fact that California law will not allow plaintiff to commit a crime and then profit from it,” the performer’s lawyers maintained in their court papers.

The judge expressed skepticism about McBride’s claims during a July 10 hearing, but gave the plaintiff another chance to convince her the lawsuit should move forward by filing an amended complaint. Fujie was not convinced by the arguments in the revised suit.

“If anything, the (amended complaint) makes even clearer than did the original complaint that (McBride) has unclean hands that prevent her from profiting from her actions,” Fujie wrote.

“Unclean hands” is a legal term in cases where the plaintiff has acted unethically in connection to the circumstances that have led to the suit.

“While Plaintiff alleges that she was not involved in the prior planning or the commission of the theft of (Gaga’s) bulldogs, she does not deny that at the time she claimed the reward she knew that they were stolen from (Gaga), nor does she deny that she received them with that knowledge,” Fujie said. “In fact, (McBride) alleges that she was aware that the bulldogs belonged to (Gaga), that they were stolen from (Gaga) and that when (McBride) received the bulldogs and contacted (the singer), she was attempting to obtain $500,000.00 from (Gaga) for property she knew was stolen.”

According to McBride’s amended complaint, the plaintiff understood that the singer would pay the reward money upon the safe return of her bulldogs with no questions asked, regardless of the fact that the animals were stolen from the performer’s dog walker.

In reliance on the offer, McBride “took possession of defendant’s bulldogs for the specific purpose of ensuring their protection and safely returning them,” according to the revised complaint, which further states that the plaintiff “was maligned and vilified in the media, which caused her to suffer substantial psychological and emotional distress.”

On Feb. 26, 2021, two days after her dogs were stolen, Gaga — whose real name is Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta — tweeted that she would pay $500,000 for their safe return, according to court papers. That same day, McBride brought the pets to the Los Angeles Police Department and they were later given back to Gaga, the singer’s lawyers’ court papers further stated.

“At the time, plaintiff said that she was a good Samaritan who happened upon the dogs on the street by chance and `had no idea’ that they belonged to (Gaga),” the 37-year-old singer’s attorneys stated.

In truth, McBride was a “direct and knowing participant in the criminal enterprise” and after her story collapsed under scrutiny from the LAPD, she was soon arrested, pleaded no contest to knowingly receiving stolen property and was sentenced to two years probation in December, the performer’s lawyers maintained.

Ryan Fischer, the singer’s dog walker, was strolling with the three dogs just off Sunset Boulevard on Feb. 24, 2021, when he was shot once in the chest with a bullet from a .40-caliber handgun. Two of the dogs were stolen. The third was left behind and later recovered.

After arrests of other alleged participants in the attack, Jaylin Keyshawn White, who was accused of choking Fischer, and Howard Jackson, who allegedly shot Fischer, were placed in adjacent cells and White was recorded lamenting the arrests and referred to McBride by name, according to the singer’s attorneys’ court papers.

Jackson pleaded no contest to attempted murder and was sentenced to 21 years in prison in December. White pleaded no contest to second-degree robbery and was sentenced in August 2022 to four years in prison.

More from The Industry

Skip to content