fbpx Hey SoCal. Change is our intention. - District, parents agree Saugus High Shooting video should be sealed
The Votes Are In!
2021 Readers' Choice is back, bigger and better than ever!
View Winners →
Nominate your favorite business!
2022 Readers' Choice is back, bigger and better than ever!
Start to nominate →
Happy... whatever makes you happy!
Subscribeto our newsletter to stay informed
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Home / News / Crime / District, parents agree Saugus High shooting video should be sealed

District, parents agree Saugus High shooting video should be sealed

by
share with

The parents of two teenagers who were shot and killed by a fellow student at Saugus High School in 2019 have joined with the William S. Hart Union High School District in asking that a school security video of the shootings and the killer’s subsequent suicide be sealed from public view in the ongoing civil litigation.

The plaintiffs in the consolidated wrongful death/negligence lawsuit are Bryan and Cindy Muehlberger, the father and mother of the late 15-year-old Gracie Anne Muehlberger, and Frank and Nancy Blackwell, the father, and mother of the late 14-year-old Dominic Blackwell.

The teens were fatally wounded when 16-year-old Nathan Berhow opened fire at the Santa Clarita school on Nov. 14, 2019. School security video showed him walk into the quad, pull a .45-caliber handgun from his backpack, shoot five people around him, then turn the gun on himself. Three other students were wounded.

Attorneys for the district, which is being sued by the plaintiffs, filed court papers on Wednesday with Chatsworth Superior Court Judge Stephen F. Pfahler asking that he seal the video, but allow it to be used during the trial if necessary. A hearing is scheduled for Friday.

“The video reflects the actual shots being fired into a group of students and Berhow’s suicide,” the district’s attorneys state in their court papers. “The public may have a right to access evidence filed in the consolidated matters herein, but its right to see the actual violence is outweighed by the privacy interests of victims and their families.”

Given that the incident has generated a considerable amount of public attention, unless the video is filed under seal it is “reasonably likely” that the images will be obtained and shown by the media, according to the district’s attorneys’ court papers. The families of the victims “should not have to watch the violence that was committed that day and have images related to the injuries and deaths of the involved minors circulated broadly to the public,” the district’s attorneys further state in their court papers.

The plaintiffs have agreed to a sealing order, according to the district’s attorneys’ court papers.

More from Crime

Skip to content