fbpx Hey SoCal. Change is our intention. - Lawsuit: Porto's bakery worker was fired because she was pregnant
The Votes Are In!
2021 Readers' Choice is back, bigger and better than ever!
View Winners →
Subscribeto our newsletter to stay informed
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Home / Top Posts / Lawsuit: Porto’s bakery worker was fired because she was pregnant

Lawsuit: Porto’s bakery worker was fired because she was pregnant

by
share with

A former Porto’s Bakery Inc. employee is suing the popular chain, alleging she was wrongfully fired from the Glendale location in 2020 for getting pregnant despite having a stellar work record that earned her praise from fellow workers and management prior to becoming an expectant mother.

Kimberly Flores’ Los Angeles Superior Court lawsuit alleges pregnancy and gender discrimination, failure to prevent discrimination and harassment and a number of violations of the state Labor Code. She’s seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages in the suit brought Friday.

A Porto’s representative could not be immediately reached for comment.

Flores was hired in December 2019 as a server and sales associate, and her job duties included greeting customers, boxing and bagging purchased items, assisting co-workers and performing other work required by her supervisors, the suit states.

Flores never had a negative work evaluation, her job performance was never criticized during her employment prior to her pregnancy and many fellow employees as well as managers commended her for her work, according to her court papers.

In late February 2020, Flores says she began bleeding at work and asked to leave to get immediate medical treatment. Her doctor issued work restrictions that disallowed her from lifting more than 10 pounds, forbade her from doing any strenuous exercise or prolonged sitting or standing and directed that she have frequent rest periods, the suit states.

Flores told Porto’s management that she was pregnant and they in turn transferred her to their customer call center, according to the complaint.

During her pregnancy, Flores says she became ill at work due to her pregnancy and she once again kept management informed. Although she did not have any attendance or job performance issues, management’s attitude toward her began to change, according to her suit.

“(Porto’s) management team grew weary of (Flores’) requests and began a campaign to terminate (her) employment,” the suit alleges.

Management cut Flores’ hours, changed her schedule to times they knew she could not work and refused to provide her with meal and rest breaks, then fired her in April 2020, the suit alleges.

Flores believes she was discriminated against and wrongfully terminated because of her pregnancy, gender, medical condition and requests for accommodations, according to her court papers. She also alleges she was denied overtime pay and is entitled to receive her compensation, along with interest and attorneys’ fees.

More from Top Posts